PLCcheck

IEC 61131-3 Compliance: Making Your PLC Code Portable

How to write PLC code that is portable between different manufacturers. Covers IEC 61131-3 compliance levels, vendor-specific extensions to avoid, and practical portability strategies.

·8 min read
IEC 61131-3portabilitycross-platformvendor-neutralPLCstandardcomplianceCODESYS

IEC 61131-3 Compliance: Making Your PLC Code Portable

IEC 61131-3 promises code portability between PLC manufacturers. The reality is more nuanced — while the language syntax is standardized, vendor-specific instruction sets, data types, and system functions are not. Here is how to maximize portability in practice.

The Portability Problem

Each PLC manufacturer implements IEC 61131-3 with extensions:

Code that uses only standard IEC 61131-3 instructions and data types can theoretically run on any compliant platform. Code that uses vendor-specific extensions is locked to that vendor.

What Is Portable

ElementPortable?Notes
Basic data types (BOOL, INT, DINT, REAL, TIME, STRING)✅ YesIdentical across platforms
Standard function blocks (TON, TOF, TP, CTU, CTD, R_TRIG)✅ YesIdentical interface
ST/SCL syntax (IF, CASE, FOR, WHILE)✅ YesMinor syntax variations
LD rungs (XIC, XIO, OTE equivalent)✅ MostlyVisual differences but same logic
Arrays and Structs✅ YesSyntax may vary slightly

What Is NOT Portable

ElementPortable?Notes
System functions (Siemens SFC/SFB, AB GSV/SSV)❌ NoCompletely vendor-specific
Communication instructions (PUT/GET, MSG)❌ NoDifferent protocols, different syntax
Safety instructions❌ NoVendor-specific safety kernels
Motion control❌ NoCompletely different architectures
HMI integration❌ NoVendor-specific tag binding
Diagnostics and error handling❌ NoDifferent OB/fault structures

Practical Portability Strategy

  1. Separate portable logic from vendor-specific logic. Put standard control algorithms (PID, sequencing, interlocks) in FBs that use only IEC standard instructions. Put communication, diagnostics, and HMI interface in separate vendor-specific FBs.

  2. Use standard data types. Avoid vendor-specific types like S5TIME (Siemens) or ALARM_ANY. Use TIME, INT, REAL.

  3. Abstract hardware access. Do not reference I/O addresses directly in control logic. Pass all I/O through a hardware abstraction layer (interface FBs or global tags). When switching vendors, only the abstraction layer changes.

  4. Document vendor-specific dependencies. In every block that uses vendor-specific instructions, add a comment listing which instructions are non-portable. This saves enormous time during future migrations.

  5. Use PLCopen function blocks where available. PLCopen defines standardized FBs for motion control (PLCopen Motion) and safety (PLCopen Safety) that are implemented by multiple vendors.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I really move a program from Siemens to Allen-Bradley?

The standard control logic (IF/THEN, timers, counters, math) translates directly. But any program of real-world complexity uses vendor-specific instructions — those must be rewritten. Realistic portability: 40–70% of code transfers conceptually, 0% transfers as-is.

Is CODESYS more portable than Siemens or AB?

CODESYS-based PLCs (Beckhoff, WAGO, ABB, Bosch Rexroth) share the same runtime, making code transfer between CODESYS platforms relatively straightforward. But CODESYS code is not directly portable to Siemens or AB platforms.


Analyze your code's vendor dependencies →

Maintained by PLCcheck.ai.

Related Articles

Analyze your PLC code with AI

PLCcheck Pro explains, documents, optimizes, and migrates PLC code — automatically.

Try PLCcheck Pro →
← Back to Blog

Not affiliated with Siemens AG. S5, S7, STEP 5, STEP 7, and TIA Portal are trademarks of Siemens AG.